Publicado por Tutoriais Admin em 17/08/2009 - 56.054 visualizações
|Gavin King is the founder of the Hibernate project, a object / relational mapping framework for Java. Currently, he works full time in the project, paid by the JBoss Group. In this exclusive interview to JavaFree , Gavin King talks about his entering in the JBoss Group, and the Hibernate Project, what ' s new in version 3 and the integration of the framework with the new features of Java 5.|
1. Please, tell us a little about yourself and your ' real ' job.
I live in Melbourne, Australia and I ' ve been working in IT - mostly Java - for about five years now. For the past year my " real " job has been Hibernate. I ' m a rare example of a developer who is paid to write open source software. In fact, myself, Christian Bauer, Steve Ebersole and Max Andersen now all work for JBoss, developing Hibernate and providing commercial services. I ' m also an active member of the JSR-220 (EJB 3.0) spec committee.
2. In your opinion, Hibernate become so successful?
Hibernate became successful because it solves a very common problem reasonably elegantly, because it is an open source solution, and because it is practical. We took seriously the idea that OO and relational technologies should work smoothly together. And we allowed our project to be driven by user requirements. We also knew that great technology is useless if you can ' t explain it.
3. What was your main motivation when you created Hibernate?
I wanted to solve an interesting problem, a problem that affected me personally. I was frustrated with working with EJB 2 style entity beans and brittle handwritten persistence layers.
Also, I wanted to win an argument with my then-boss; -)
4. What benefits your decision of joining the JBoss Group may bring to the Hibernate project?
In the long run, it ' s simply not possible to do a project with the scope of Hibernate in your spare time. By the time I joined JBoss, I was spending so much time responding to questions from users and fixing minor bugs, that there was no time left for sleeping, let alone improving Hibernate. So working for JBoss has made it possible for Hibernate to continue to exist and grow. It also allows us to actually get out there in the field, speaking at conferences and JUGs, working on site with Hibernate users, and participating in the JCP.
From the point of view of Hibernate users, they get not just a better product (due to having four fulltime developers), but also the opportunity to get training and buy 24 / 7 production support. Not everyone cares about these things, but a lot of people do, especially in larger organizations.
5. How do you see other ORM tools like OJB, JDO and Toplink? Do you evaluate or spend time looking at feature of those products? Why people would choose Hibernate?
Um, traditionally, no, we did not pay that much attention - I was much more comfortable being guided by request from users, than by " what the other guys got ". However, more recently, we have done some feature-by-feature competitive evaluations of the two leading commercial ORM solutions, just to make sure we didn ' t miss anything. This has had some influence upon the feature list of Hibernate3, where there are a couple of features that I would describe as being more useful for marketing than for practical purposes.
The Hibernate3 core (currently in alpha) is the most powerful ORM engine in the world - and it will take a little while for others to catch up. However, we ' ve realized more recently that there is more than just the runtime engine to think about and over the next year there will be a lot more focus upon polishing and in some cases rewriting our development-time toolset. Max is leading that effort. Hibernate will evolve into a suite of products that address the whole problem of writing Java applications which use relational data.
6. How do you see alternatives to relational databases, like XML and OO databases, or Prevayler?
We don ' t see them; -)
Truly, the relational data model is a wonderful innovation, and it would be an absolute disaster to replace it with flawed persistence technologies like XMLDBs or OODBMS. Fortunately, that simply won ' t happen, since there is simply no industry interest or momentum behind either.
Technologies like OODBMS sacrifice sound, application technology agnostic data management for sort-term convenience (convenience for one single application, written using one particular programming language). Relational technology essentially completely replaced network or hierarchical database technology, and there were excellent reasons why that happened. We should most certainly not be reviving either of those discredited approaches by slapping on the latest buzzwords (OO, XML, etc) as window dressing.
7. Are there any changes you would like to see in the JDBC API to make Hibernate better and faster?
It would be great to be able to batch together different SQL statements using the JDBC batch update API (at present, you can only batch multiple parameter sets for the same statement).
However, rather than seeing many new features in JDBC, I would be incredibly happy if vendors would simply provide complete, reliable implementations of the features that are already there in JDBC 3. It ' s actually quite disgraceful how broken the JDBC drivers of certain big-name RDBMS vendors are. They don ' t seem to care.
8. Is there any plan to make Hibernate compliant with the JDO Spec?
No. Hibernate will provide an implementation of the EJB3 EntityManager defined by the JSR-220 specification. Sun has just announced that the scope of JSR-220 will be expanded to cover operation outside the traditional monolithic J2EE container.
We don ' t see any future for JDO.
9. Do you foresee the upcoming release of EJB3 reducing the need for Hibernate? Are there any benefits of using both, like in a BMP environment?
EJB 3.0 is a specification. Hibernate will be an implementation of that specification. So you can use both at the same time; -) Alternatively, we intend that some people, who don ' t care about standards as much, will continue to use Hibernate-specific APIs, especially for functionality that is not yet standardized by JSR-220.
10. Could you tell us about what ' s new in Hibernate 3, and the benefits these changes will bring to users?
The biggest, most innovative new thing is the support for parameterized " filters ". This feature let ' s you see an object graph that is just a subset of the total data in the database. This is incredibly useful when dealing with temporal, versioned, regional, or permissioned data. In fact, I expect that most business domains have usecases for this feature and that it will soon be considered an indispensable feature of Hibernate.
We have done a huge amount of work on adding greater mapping flexibility, to support more complex (or even broken) relational models. This takes the form of a number of small new features, that are really most significant when taken together. Hibernate is now able to handle just about any crazy thing you are likely to find in a legacy database.
In addition, it is now possible to override any SQL statement that Hibernate generates with your own hand-written SQL. This gives your DBA the freedom to hand-tune the SQL when necessary.
Some further major changes in Hibernate3 were designed to align us more closely with JSR-220.
Finally, we put a huge amount of thought into what small changes we could make that would make Hibernate easier to use for beginners. Hopefully that will reduce the incidence of certain FAQs in the Hibernate forum!
11. How about Metadata in Java 5.0? Do you have plans to support it? It is a real alternative to hbm.xml?
Absolutely! Emmanuel Bernard is working on implementing the EJB 3.0 ORM metadata for Hibernate, and adding Hibernate-specific extensions.
We ' ve seen how many people like to use XDoclet annotations to express their Hibernate mappings, and so I ' m quite certain that even more people will feel comfortable using JSR-175 annotations.
In fact, I fully expect that this will be the most common way to use ORM in the future.
12. How can Generics change our Hibernate code?
Not a great deal. Hibernate can already persist templated collections, so you can get a bit more strongly typed in your domain model. Templated collections could even help Hibernate guess the type of an association and reduce the amount of metadata you have to write. However, I don ' t think this is an especially significant new feature in the context of ORM.
13. Which of Tiger ' s new features are more likely to be used in the Hibernate code base in the future? Why?
Well, we are a bit stuck. We can ' t use many of the new features, because Hibernate needs to stay source-level compatible with older JDKs. The annotations stuff is okay, because we can provide it as an add-on package.
Certainly, annotations are the most significant new feature of Java 5, and it ' s very likely that they will completely change the way we write code.
14. What do you do in your free time?
https: / / javafree.dev.java.net /